Missouri Department of Transportation Archives

Who burned Barrel Bob? MoDOT’s mascot back in the shop for repairs after fire prank

October 23, 2015 By Bill Pollock

Barrel Bob has seen better days (photo/MODOT)

Motorists might have noticed that Barrel Bob, the Missouri Department of Transportation’s 10-foot tall orange mascot who works to promote work zone safety, is missing from his post on U.S. Route 50/63 in Jefferson City.

Barrel Bob hasn’t been kidnapped (which has happened before), but it appears he may have been victimized by an act of early Halloween villainy. The friendly work zone safety mascot was set on fire Tuesday evening on Route 50/63. Bob was discovered slumped over on the ground, with severe burns on his legs and torso. One leg was completely melted and the other was damaged in the fire. Both legs will need to be replaced.

Bob was taken into the shop on Wednesday and is receiving intensive repair. The mascot is expected to be out of commission for at least the next two weeks.

Barrel Bob didn’t swear revenge, but he has vowed to return to his post and resume his job of spreading the important message of work zone safety as soon as he is able.

If you would like send Bob get well wishes, you can follow him on Facebook

Story courtesy: MoDOT

Highway Commission’s role on Amendment 7, post project list approval

July 10, 2014 By Mike Lear

Now that the Highways and Transportation Commission has approved a final project list for the Amendment 7 ballot issue, it’s not going to totally step away from the issue.

“We’re not part of a campaign. That’s left to other people,” says Chairman Stephen Miller of Kansas City, “We’ll be a resource to anyone that needs education about these projects.”

The projects total more than 800, ranging from a stretch of sidewalk in some communities to the $500-million dollar expansion of 200 miles of Interstate 70 from four lanes to six. All of them hinge on voter approval of a three-quarters of one-cent sales tax on August 5. Opponents say that tax increase would disproportionately burden the poorest 20% of Missourians.

Governor Jay Nixon (D) has been one such critic. Asked about Nixon’s opposition, Miller, who was appointed by Nixon, says it is the governor’s prerogative as it is for any Missouri voter, to evaluate the project list and the potential impacts of the tax.

“We’re prepared to let all voices be heard in that process, including our public leaders,” says Miller.

Miller is asked about Governor’ Nixon’s opposition to the transportation tax proposal:

Supporter: plenty of time for voters to review transportation tax project list

June 12, 2014 By Mike Lear

The Transportation Department will release at noon Friday its draft list of projects that would be slated for completion if voters approve a tax increase in August.

Photo courtesy; the Missouri Department of Transportation

The draft list will have the projects that the Highways and Transportation Commission would make sure are completed if voters approve the three-quarters of one cent increase. That list will be the subject of a series of public hearings, and projects could be added or removed before it is made final.

See the list of projects when it is posted at noon, and of dates of public hearings

Co-Chairman Bill McKenna with Missourians for Safe Transportation and New Jobs says that list will be limited by what money is expected to be available.

“The Commission doesn’t want to put something on the list that it won’t deliver over this ten-year period,” says McKenna. He says it has good incentive not to let any projects that make the final list go unfinished.

“Because it’s a temporary tax – at the end of ten years it’s gone – there’ll be an effort to extend it. So if MODOT doesn’t do what they say they’re going to do the chance of that being extended is probably pretty small,” says McKenna. “It’s kind of an extra guarantee to the voters that … you give MODOT this much money, this is what you’ll get in return.”

What the proposal is projected to give the Missouri Department of Transportation is an estimated $5.4-billion dollars over ten years. 90-percent of that will go to state transportation projects, with the remainder going to cities and counties for transportation projects. Those would not be limited to road and bridge projects, but would also include, “urban and rural transit, friendlier bike and pedestrian accommodations, improvements in rail, ports and airports,” as the Department’s website puts it.

The issue could have been awaiting voters in November but Governor Jay Nixon (D) acted on his option to move it to August. That put pressure on the Department to get a list ready so that voters can see what they will be asked to consider. McKenna says it wasn’t too much pressure, however.

“This isn’t something that just came out of the blue when the (legislative) session ended,” says McKenna. “MODOT and their planning partners have been working on this for many years … and I think they were probably ahead of the curve.”

McKenna thinks even people who don’t see local projects they want passed on that list could find reason to support the tax. He says, “I know that I have stuff here in (my home) county that’s not going to get on it, but I know that the things that are ahead of it, if they get taken care of, then mine moves up the list as well.”

McKenna cautions voters that no project is guaranteed to be on the final list.

“I don’t think there’s any safe bets, but we’ll know what the safe bets are by the end of this month,” McKenna says. “That will still give the voters plenty of time to look at it and make their decisions.”

The Commission is anticipated to vote on finalizing a list at its meeting later this month.

Public perception of MODOT could be key in sales tax increase’s fate

May 27, 2014 By Mike Lear

Whether Missouri voters approve or reject a proposed three-quarters-of-one-cent sales tax increase to support transportation could have a lot to do with their memories going back about 22 years.

Senator Mike Kehoe (R-Jefferson City). Photo courtesy, Missouri State Senate Communications.

In 1992, the 15-year highway plan was enacted that included making all highways to towns of 5,000 people or larger four-lanes and a widening of Interstates 70 and 44 to six lanes. Six years later the plan was scrapped. The Missouri Department of Transportation later said it had been based on cost estimates that were too low, project inflation and growth weren’t accounted for and it planned on expending more money than was projected to come in.

The plan’s failure was blamed for the rejection by voters in 2002 of a $500-million transportation tax increase. Then in 2004 Missourians approved Amendment 3, shifting all revenues from the motor vehicle fuel tax to state and local highways, roads and bridges. The Department went to work on projects throughout the state and its public perception has improved.

Senator Mike Kehoe (R-Jefferson City) joined the Highways and Transportation Commission in 2005 and later became its chairman. He says perception was on the mind of Governor Matt Blunt (R) when Kehoe was appointed.

“One of the first things Governor Blunt went out and said was, ‘You need to try to work with some of our rural groups and tell them about the 15-year plan,” says Kehoe. “I said well that’s simple. MODOT screwed up. They didn’t do the right thing. They didn’t fulfill their commitment.”

Kehoe says the Commission and the Department, then directed by Pete Rahn, were committed to improving on the earlier failure and winning back the trust of the public. He says in partnership with contractors, they were able to do that.

Now it is that success that he says could help supporters of the transportation tax proposal sell it to voters between now and August 5.

“MODOT wants to take that reputation, said, ‘We messed up once in ’92. You told us we messed up. We listened. We got a second chance in ’04 with Amendment 3, and now we want to move forward under that same trust and relationship that we’ve built with you, Missouri, and deliver projects to you again,'” says Kehoe.

Listen to Kehoe discuss how the perception of MODOT since Amendment 3 relates to the proposed tax increase

Governor Jay Nixon (D) on Friday announced action to put that proposed constitutional amendment on the primary ballot along with four other proposed amendments. The plan would generate an estimated $534-million a year for ten years to support roads and bridges and other transportation infrastructure in Missouri.

Senate sponsor OK with transportation tax on August ballot

May 26, 2014 By Mike Lear

The Senate sponsor of the proposed three-quarters-of-one-cent sales tax increase to benefit transportation doesn’t think it makes much difference that Governor Jay Nixon (D) has put it on the August primary ballot rather than the November ballot.

Senator Mike Kehoe (R-Jefferson City) says the shorter timeframe does leave supporters less time to make their case to voters, but it won’t change the issue.

“The problem hasn’t gone away,” says Kehoe. “No matter what date we have it on the ballot, the issue of repairing our roads, safety for our citizens, economic development and the jobs these projects can create, and the ripple effect on our economy is still a significant question.”

Another issue that has Nixon has put on the August ballot is the so-called “right to farm” amendment to the Missouri Constitution. Kehoe thinks that could be a good pairing.

“Rural Missourians understand that one of the ways that we can improve the safety on our rural roads is by making sure that the Department of Transportation has significant projects,” says Kehoe. “The same people that support the Right to Farm amendment may see this as a significant option to choose in order to protect our agricultural industry, so I’m hoping those two actually could compliment each other.”

Missouri Republican Party Executive Director Matt Wills notes his party’s supporter tend to turn out strongly in primaries, and they traditionally oppose tax increases. He thinks that could be what Nixon is banking on.

“I think placing it on the primary ballot, the Governor really looks at it saying, ‘Well, Republicans will turn out to defeat this and it doesn’t hurt Democrats because it’s a ballot initiative, but Republicans in the legislature will look bad for putting up a tax increase that gets defeated by their own party,'” says Wills. “I don’t really think that is sound logic.”

The proposed transportation tax would generate an estimated $534-million annually for ten years before automatically going back in front of voters who could consider its renewal.

Nixon announced on Friday action to have that and the “right to farm” issue decided in August as well as a proposed amendments to create a new lottery ticket with proceeds benefitting Missouri veterans, to protect against searches and seizures of electronic communications and data, and to make the right to keep and bear arms in Missouri an unalienable right that must be upheld by the state.

Legislature puts sales tax increase for transportation to MO voters

May 14, 2014 By Mike Lear

The state legislature is asking Missouri voters if they want to raise the state sales tax to support transportation.

The Senate changed the proposal from a 1-cent sales tax increase to a three-fourths-of-one-cent increase and sent it to the House 22-10. The House on Wednesday approved that 105-43, meaning it will go on the statewide ballot in November unless Governor Nixon sets a special election date for it.

If passed it would generate an estimated $534-million dollars annually, running for ten years beginning in 2015.

The proposal is HJR 68

The Missouri Department of Transportation has said it will soon not have the money for road and bridge maintenance. It has already quit adding new projects to its five-year construction program and suspended a cost-share program, in which the Department split the cost of a project with local governments in the area it would impact.

The Department’s Director, Dave Nichols, issued a statement praising passage of the proposed amendment.

Nichols writes, “Today is a great day for the future of transportation in Missouri. I would like to thank the General Assembly for passing this important legislation that gives Missourians the opportunity to improve our economy and keep our families safe by investing in much-needed transportation improvements.

“We are working with planning partners around the state and representatives from every mode of transportation to determine how this new revenue could best improve our total transportation system. We are ready to deliver the projects and services that Missourians expect and deserve.”

How they voted: House on sales tax increase for transportation

May 14, 2014 By Mike Lear

The state House has completed the legislature’s vote to ask Missourians whether they want to increase the sales tax by three-quarters of a percent to support transportation. Because the proposal has already cleared the Senate, it will go on the ballot in November unless Governor Jay Nixon (D) sets a special election date for it.

Click here to see who your state representative is using the search tool on the House’s homepage

Sponsor: House will try to pass three-fourths cent transportation sales tax

April 30, 2014 By Mike Lear

The House sponsor of a proposed sales tax increase to support transportation says he plans to take up the three-fourths-of-a-cent tax proposal passed by the Senate, and try to get it passed in the House.

Representative Dave Hinson (photo courtesy; Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

If the House approves that proposal without any changes, it would go to voters in November or in a special election.

The three-fourths cent proposal would generate about $534-million annually. The House had passed a one-cent tax increase over ten years that was projected to generate about $800-million annually for various forms of transportation projects.

The proposal is HJR 68

Representative Dave Hinson (R-St. Clair) says three-quarters of a cent should be plenty for the Transportation Department.

“Three-quarters will get a lot of major projects done that are needed to be done across the state,” says Hinson. “Of course it will leave us about a billion dollars short of what we were hoping for, but you know in ten years the voters will get a chance to review what MODOT’s done and see if they want to continue it on.”

Hinson doesn’t think the three-fourths cent tax proposal will have any trouble being passed in the House.

“I think actually we may pick up some votes,” says Hinson. “We had 96 ‘yes’ votes when we third read it in the House and we’ll probably be, I would think, around 100.”

Majority Floor Leader John Diehl (R-Town and Country) says the House likely won’t take up the transportation tax issue again until the situation with a tax cut proposal, SB 509, has been settled. Governor Jay Nixon (D) is anticipated to veto that bill and the Republican legislative majority is expected to attempt to then override his veto.

Senators say mixed messaging in transportation sales tax, income tax cut proposals

April 16, 2014 By Mike Lear

An opponent of asking voters to support transportation with a one-cent sales tax for ten years says it’s “illogical” coming from lawmakers who also want to cut taxes.

Senator John Lamping

Legislative budget estimates are that the proposed ten-year tax would generate about $720-million annually. Senator John Lamping (R-St. Louis) noted in a Senate Transportation Committee hearing Wednesday that members of the Republican majority in both chambers are pursuing major tax cuts.

“The $600-million to $900-million that we have agreed to remove from General Revenue … that’s the funding source. That could serve as potential funding source for roads,” Lamping tells the House sponsor of the proposal, Representative Dave Hinson (R-St. Clair). Lamping says that contradicts the argument that the state doesn’t have the money to fund roads.

Hinson argues that a legislature can’t be counted on to fund transportation out of General Revenue.

“Ask the school districts and the veterans how that’s working out for them, the promises that the General Assembly has made in the past,” Hinson tells Lamping. “We’re not fully funding veterans programs, we’re not fully funding the school foundation formula.”

Lamping argues that his proposal to permanently redirect a half-percent of sales or use taxes to the state’s road fund is a way to ensure that transportation remains funded, even out of General Revenue. Opponents of his proposal say funding transportation from General Revenue risks inserting politics into transportation decisions.

Senator Jason Holsman

Senator Jason Holsman (D-Kansas City) says he supports the transportation tax because of the projected funding shortfall for MODOT, but he also questions asking for that tax increase while Republican lawmakers push for a tax cut.

“My concern … is the perception and the messaging that we’re sending to the people,” says Holsman. “From a social science standpoint is it wise to reduce your revenues and then ask your voters to increase the burden on them?” he asks Hinson.

“Some people would probably agree with you that it’s probably not the wisest thing to do,” Hinson answers.

Lamping also questions whether $720-million would be enough to provide for maintaining Missouri’s current infrastructure and new projects. He notes projections that the Transportation Department’s budget could be as low as $350-million by 2017, and that maintaining roads cost about $700-million.

“Are they going to not repair the roads while they’re building these projects?” asks Lamping.

Hinson says he doesn’t know if the projects that would be seen would be considered new, rather than repair and maintenance. He points to projects such as those to widen shoulders and add rumble strips to lettered routes.

Hinson’s proposal cleared the House last week 96-53.

Criminal Code path forward could hinge on federal transportation money concern

April 14, 2014 By Mike Lear

Whose version of criminal code legislation will advance could depend on how each might impact federal transportation money.

House and Senate lawmakers who have spent years working on an update of Missouri’s system of criminal laws and punishments must now decide which chambers’ version of that rewrite to go with.

Representative Judy Morgan (D-Kansas City) says one issue that must be considered was raised by the Transportation Department.

“What we found out in fiscal review,” says Morgan, “with the House bill we may be out of compliance with that mandatory minimum sentencing and it may cause us to lose $18-million in funds as a result of that.”

The sponsor of the House criminal code bill, Representative Stanley Cox (R-Sedalia), says he thought the issue had been resolved.

“We have distributed this and encouraged various state agencies,” he tells Morgan, “and really I thought that we had made MODOT happy, but we’ll certainly continue working on it.”

The sponsor of the Senate legislation, Senator Jolie Justus (D-Kansas City) says that issue has been dealt with in her chamber’s version.

“They brought that concern to us months ago. We fixed it months ago on the Senate side. It is not a problem.”

The Senate version of the bill is also smaller, having been reduced to about 700 pages while the House version is still around the 1000-mark.