• Home
  • News
    • Business
    • Crime / Courts
    • Health / Medicine
    • Legislature
    • Politics / Govt
  • Sports
    • The Bill Pollock Show
  • Contact Us
    • Reporters
  • Affiliates
    • Affiliate Support

Missourinet

Your source for Missouri News and Sports

You are here: Home / Health / Medicine / MU Nuclear Engineering professor calls report of elevated radiation in Missouri snow ‘bogus’

MU Nuclear Engineering professor calls report of elevated radiation in Missouri snow ‘bogus’

January 10, 2014 By Mike Lear

A University of Missouri Professor dismisses reports being circulated on social media that say radiation levels in recent snowfall in Missouri are elevated and suggest the increase is related to damage done to the Fukishima power plant in Japan by a 2011 tsunami.

One such story was published in a British tabloid and says “double the normal amount of radiation has been found in Missouri snow,” and ties it to concerns over the impact of the Fukishima disaster. 

Some people seeing it on Facebook and Twitter could be alarmed.  By 5 p.m. Friday it had been “liked” by more than 7,000 Facebook users and shared more than 9,000 times.

Professor of Nuclear Engineering Bill Miller says it is “bogus.” Firstly, he questions what the writer thinks is a “normal amount of radiation.”

“They don’t specifically give a value,” says Miller.

He notes the article says radiation levels on sand on a beach in San Francisco have reached over 150 micro-REM per hour and calls that five times the normal level, while Miller asserts that amount is 300-times smaller than the radiation humans are exposed to daily in nature.

“So,” he concludes of the amount of radiation the article says was detected in snow in Missouri, “I guess we’re now down to something on the order of one-thousandth of mother nature’s radiation levels … certainly way, way, way below any kind of health concern whatsoever.”

Whether that is a higher amount of radiation than is normally found in snow, Miller didn’t know offhand, but he says the amounts of radiation described in the article are far less than humans are exposed to regularly.

Miller adds, if a level of radiation dangerous to humans is present, it would be detected.

“We have instruments that are out in the world that are testing the atmosphere to see whether or not anybody has set off a nuclear weapon, and they are very, very sensitive so that we could indeed see an atmospheric test of a nuclear weapon from clear around the world.”

Miller tells Missourinet the World Health Organization, the International Atomic Energy Agency and other international health organizations have concluded that no one in the public, even those living near the Fukishima plant in Japan, face health risks becuase of the incident at that plant.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Filed Under: Health / Medicine, News, Science / Technology Tagged With: radiation, University of Missouri

Subscribe to our daily newsletter


Tweets by Missourinet

Sports

Whit Merrifield is convinced the Royals are going to make a run (AUDIO)

Whit … [Read More...]

Baseball expert say Royals first five hitters has big threat potential (PODCAST)

Thanks for … [Read More...]

Mizzou to face LSU on March 6 at home

The … [Read More...]

Mizzou could really use the help of getting Texas A & M rescheduled (PODCAST)

Thanks for … [Read More...]

Blues drop third straight with loss to Kings

The St. … [Read More...]

More Sports

Tweets by missourisports

Archives

Opinion/Editorials

TwitterFacebook

Copyright © 2021 · Learfield News & Ag, LLC