May 19, 2013

Funding for developmentally disabled, blind still in question on final morning of session

One unresolved issue in this final day of the legislative session is how four programs will be funded, that the legislature tied in its budget to the passage of a bill to repeal a tax credit for low-income seniors in rental properties.

Those are First Steps, that supports families with children with developmental disabilities, early childhood education, healthcare for the blind and community health centers.

House Budget Committee Chairman Rick Stream (R-Kirkwood) (photo courtesy; Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

House Budget Committee Chairman Rick Stream (R-Kirkwood) (photo courtesy; Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

House leadership had earlier in the week said that one possibility was to attach that tax credit repeal to a larger tax credit reform package. It was amended on the House floor to a Senate bill, SB 24, on Wednesday, but the House failed to adopt the changes. The same amendment had been among those drafted for SB 112 that the House sent back to the Senate yesterday, but it was not offered on the floor.

House Budget Committee Chairman Rick Stream (R-Kirkwood) says the Senate has indicated it won’t support the tax credit repeal.

Instead, it has amended language to a couple of bills to use higher-than-expected state revenue to fund those programs. Stream had first been cool to that approach because it would mean exceeding the Consensus Revenue Estimate, a budget spending amount agreed to by the House, the Senate and the Governor in December. He says now, however, that’s the way to go.

“We have to face reality, and the reality is that the Senate has moved in a different direction in the last several days. So, we’re going to follow suit and make sure the people get the funding for the programs that we think need to be funded.”

The Senate’s funding mechanism has been added to HB 986, which has been sent back to the House where it will likely be taken up today.

Stream maintains Governor Jay Nixon created the question of how those programs would be supported.

He says the legislature’s budget was balanced on, “a bill that the Governor had initially proposed in his budget, had supported for three months, then backed away from it at the last minute.”

House leadership has said that the bill to repeal that senior renters tax credit used language drafted and offered by the Governor’s Office, and that Nixon’s state Budget Director Linda Luebbering had privately assured Stream that the Governor supported the bill less than two days before he said he would veto it.

House version of tax reform legislation passed

The House has passed its version of legislation Republicans hope will level the playing field for Missouri among neighboring states. The proposal would cut income taxes for individuals and businesses will increasing the state sales tax.

Representative Andrew Koenig (photo courtesy; Missouri House Communications)

Representative Andrew Koenig (photo courtesy; Missouri House Communications)

Estimates from legislative researchers say the plan would eventually cut state revenue by $438 million annually. The changes wouldn’t kick in unless state revenue collections grow by at least $100 million year-to-year.

See the legislation, SB 26.

Representative Judy Morgan (D-Kansas City) and other Democrats say the bill will hurt the poor by shifting the tax burden.

“The reduction of the personal and corporate and business income tax, increase of the sales tax, guess who’s going to benefit from that. Not the people that make less than $33,000 a year. They will pay more in taxes because of the sales taxes and the people who will benefit will be millionaires.”

The House handler of the bill, Representative Andrew Koenig (R-Manchester) says the claims the bill will hurt the poor are “false” and “scare tactics.”

“In this bill there’s a $2000 deduction on income tax. We have a sales tax code that is laced with exemptions on the basic necessities of life … on food, gasoline, mortgage, rent, etcetera.”

The plan would cut the top personal income tax rate by two-thirds of a percent over five years. The corporate income tax would be gradually reduced by three-quarters of a percent, while a new 50 percent deduction would be phased in for business income reported on owners’ individual tax returns.

Personal deductions on individual income taxes for those with incomes under $20,000 annually would nearly double and the first $25,000 of corporate income from taxation would be exempted.

The sales tax would be gradually increased by three-fifths of a cent to pay for roads and education. The plan would set aside part of that increase to pay to replace the Missouri State Mental Hospital in Fulton. An amendment added on the House floor would also send part of the increase in sales revenue to the state’s schools.

The House version of the plan includes tax amnesty language that its budget writers and Governor Jay Nixon assume the passage of to balance their budget proposals.

The package passed the House 90-68, well short of the support needed to overturn a veto by the Governor who has opposed an earlier version of the bill. 19 Republicans voted with Democrats against it.

It goes back to the Senate.

Sponsor: legislature won’t try to override Governor’s veto of use tax bill

For the second straight year, Governor Jay Nixon has vetoed a bill to address the charging of taxes on vehicles purchased out-of-state.

Senator Mike Kehoe (R-Jefferson City).  Photo courtesy, Missouri State Senate Communications.

Senator Mike Kehoe (R-Jefferson City). Photo courtesy, Missouri State Senate Communications.

Nixon says Senate Bill 182 doesn’t give voters the opportunity to address all the changes that would make in local and state taxes they have to pay. The bill’s sponsor, Senator Mike Kehoe (R-Jefferson City) says he’s disappointed with the Nixon Administration’s assessment.

“We presented them with many versions of this bill that just didn’t come out earlier. I’m not an attorney but other folks who have looked at this feel like their concerns are addressed in other areas of the bill, so it certainly wasn’t an intentional thing.”

See the Governor’s veto message.

Though Kehoe’s Republican party has a supermajority in both the House and the Senate, he says a veto overturn will not be attempted.

“I’m going to do what I think is best for Missouri small businesses and municipalities, and I think that’s not let this get caught up in politics, which, sometimes a veto override can get very political. The Governor’s office has promised they would give us some suggested language to ease their concerns by Monday. I’m going to incorporate those changes and then find a bill that’s moving … a vehicle, if you will … that’s moving somewhere where those changes will fit on and try to get it [passed this session].”

He thinks it’s important the issue be resolved this year.

“Every day that goes by, we’re losing sales to competing states. Municipalities are losing tax revenues, and the more that sales start to go to other states, the jobs will follow, and so it’s very important.”

Kehoe thinks there is enough support to get the legislation through again. SB 182 passed the Senate unanimously and passed out of the House 123-32.

Governor’s office: Revenue Dept will stop scanning concealed carry applicant info

Governor Jay Nixon’s office has announced that the Department of Revenue will no longer scan or keep certificates of qualification for Missouri concealed carry permit holders.

Governor Jay Nixon fields questions about the scanning and retention of applicant information by the Revenue Department's Field Offices, April 3.

Governor Jay Nixon fields questions about the scanning and retention of applicant information by the Revenue Department’s Field Offices, April 3.

In a statement Nixon says scanning and retention of those documents is not necessary to ensure the integrity of the license issuance process. Department spokespeople had told a House Committee that the scans were made and kept in an effort to weed out fraud.

The Department will continue scanning other documents from licence applicants.  When asked if the database of scans being stored in the state data center in Jefferson City would be destroyed, Nixon said, ”I’ll leave that to Department of Revenue to go through any other details.” 

The announcement comes a day after the resignation of the Department’s Director, Brian Long, who had been appointed in December around the same time the Department began making those scans.

Nixon says he will keep working with policymakers to ensure the license issuance process is secure and private.

Nixon has maintained that the Department was not sending private information from concealed carry and driver’s licence applicants to the federal government. He also said it was not storing such information in a database, but the Department’s spokespeople testified it was being retained in the state data center.

House Republican files plan to transform Medicaid

A House Republican plan to change Medicaid in Missouri into a more “market-based” system has been unveiled. GOP lawmakers have been developing it since December as an alternative to Medicaid eligibility expansion, as backed by Governor Jay Nixon.

Representative Jay Barnes (photo courtesy; Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

Representative Jay Barnes (photo courtesy; Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

Representative Jay Barnes (R-Jefferson City) filed the proposal this morning. It would raise some eligibility levels and lower others, bringing them nearer to 100 percent of the federal poverty level and lowering the overall number of Missourians eligible.

The eligibility level for children would drop from 300 to 100 percent, taking off the Medicaid rolls about 44,000 children. That reduction would not begin until Fiscal Year 2019 because the Affordable Care Act would not allow it to happen earlier.

The plan would reduce eligibility for pregnant women from 185 percent to 133 percent, reducing the Medicaid rolls by 977 recipients, and for women with cancer from 200 percent to 100 percent, reducing the rolls by 32 recipients.

It would raise the eligibilty level for parents and childless adults from 19 percent of the federal poverty level to 100 percent, extending eligibility to about 172,000 people. It would also extend eligibility to about 7,400 people under a new category, “medically frail.”

Barnes says his plan would change Medicaid into the most free market public health system in the country. He estimates it would save the state at least $741 million over the next 8 years. It would require $482 million in federal money in the fiscal year starting July 1.

The plan would need at least three waivers from the Obama administration, for the changes in eligibility, the cash incentives for patients and the change to a bid managed healthcare system.

Barnes says, “If [the Obama administration is] serious about working with people that have different ideologies than they do, people who believe in the 2000-plus year history of free markets to bring down cost and improve quality, they’re going to allow some states to do things that haven’t been done before and this is a proposal to do just that.”

Barnes’ plan would have managed care providers offer competing plans. Recipients would choose from those a health insurance plan with either a high deductible or a co-pay. Primary care or preventive services would not have a deductible or co-pay. Recipients who don’t use all the money in their co-pay or deductible could receive a portion of it at the end of the year.

Barnes says this gives recipients an incentive to save taxpayers money and discourage things like unnecessary trips to emergency rooms for conditions that could be treated in other ways.

Governor Nixon announced in November his intent to push for Medicaid expansion to cover adults earning up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level. He says it would extend coverage to 300,000 more Missourians by fiscal year 2018 and save the state more than $586 million over the next 8 years. Nixon also says his plan will create 24,000 jobs.

The changes in eligibility depend on the existence of a federal health care exchange, which Missouri does not have yet. Barnes says the exchange would offer subsidies for insurance coverage for the populations with reduced eligibility.