May 18, 2013

House debates funding cut to Division of Motor Services

Democrats in the state House have defended Governor Jay Nixon’s stance that the budget the legislature has sent him must results in cuts and layoffs, because it doesn’t fully fund the Division of Motor Vehicles.

Governor Jay Nixon announces he will make cuts and layoffs in the Department of Motor Vehicles if the legislature carries through with a proposal to provide only eight months' worth of funding to that Department.

Governor Jay Nixon.

That budget includes only enough funding for the Division for eight months. Republican budget makers want the Revenue Department to change its licensing procedures and, if it does, they say the rest of that Division’s annual budget can be appropriated in January.

Nixon issued a statement this week saying if that happens, he will make cuts to programs and lay off state workers to live within that two-thirds budget.

Representative Jill Schupp (D-Creve Coeur) says the reduced funding ties the Governor’s hands.

“We have to expect that the Governor is going to assume what we have told him to assume, which is that we only have eight months’ worth of money in the budget. We have to be prepared to spend those eight months’ worth of dollars over the twelve month cycle of the budget.”

Representative Jeff Roorda (D-Barnhart) calls the reduction improper.

“This is bureaucratic euthanasia. We’re putting a pillow over the face of this department and trying to suffocate it in retaliation for some perceived wrongdoing that is still in question.”

Republicans defended the tactic, however, saying there is precedent for it and their intent to fund the rest of the Division’s annual budget in January has been made clear.

Representative Jay Barnes (R-Jefferson City) called the Governor’s threat to make cuts and layoffs, “disgusting, it’s dishonest and it’s deplorable. It’s an insult to the intelligence of all Missourians. That Department is fully funded for long enough that we can come back next year and do a supplemental.

State Budget Director Linda Luebbering says there is no plan on where those cuts might be made or how many employees might lose their jobs, and Nixon has not taken questions on the matter from the media.

A second attempt at education reform fails in the House (AUDIO)

For the second time, an attempt by House leadership to pass education reform legislation has failed in a late night vote.

Representative Jay Barnes speaks on the House floor on SB 125 while it's Senate sponsor, Senator Jamilah Nasheed, looks on.  Barnes handled her bill in the House.  (photo courtesy; Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

Representative Jay Barnes speaks on the House floor on SB 125 while its Senate sponsor, Senator Jamilah Nasheed, looks on. Barnes handled her bill in the House. (photo courtesy; Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

Changes were proposed to Senate bill 125 sponsored by Senator Jamilah Nasheed (D-St. Louis City) that would lift the two-year wait before the state can intervene in a failing school district to add language to institute principal evaluations.

The plan was carried in the House by Representative Jay Barnes (R-Jefferson City), who said he would rather have offered all the provisions in SB 125.

“What I’m going to attempt to do tonight is to take a part of a bill … and we’re going to amend it down to a [principal evaluations] which I believe can and should pass this body because it got 104 votes when it was offered earlier this session as an amendment onto a bill.”

The proposal inspired impassioned comments from lawmakers including Representative Steve Webb (D-Florissant), who supported the bill.

“We’re failing. We’re failing. And while we’re talking about putting letter grades on schools, which I think we should do, let’s put a letter grade on this legislature. It’s been an ‘F.’”

Representative Vicki Englund (D-St. Louis) says the principal evaluation proposal would not have allowed school districts to do anything they can’t already.

“A lot of the things that we debate are already tools in the toolbox. It’s a matter of how the school board members choose to use them or don’t choose to use them, and there are things that make school districts different. For example, the funding level that each school district receives, in my opinion, greatly impacts the quality of the education that the children receive.”

After a close vote adopted the amendment to implement principal evaluations, the House voted down its substitute for the bill 76-82, after leaving the board open the full 30 minutes possible as supporters tried to swing votes. The Senate bill has been laid aside on the House Calendar and could be taken up again and passed in the form in which it left the Senate before the session ends next week.

The education discussion turned what had been a night of at time jovial debate by lawmakers who had just returned from a social event into a somber and tense debate.

Senator Nasheed, who had been talking to lawmakers from the side floor galleries of the House throughout the debate, left the chamber for a time after Representative Keith English (D-Florrisant) shouted at her to quit threatening people. English was a “nay” vote on the bill.

When House Majority Floor Leader John Deihl (R-Town and Country) moved for the previous question, to cut off debate and force a vote on the bill, Representative Genise Montecillo (D-St. Louis) stormed off the floor. Montecillo, often vocal on education issues, had been standing to speak throughout the debate but was not recognized to.

The House in April voted down a teacher performance evaluation proposal (see the story on that bill).

AUDIO:  Hear Steve Webb’s floor remarks, 5:47

Plan for surplus includes money for Capitol, old prison site, mental hospital

The state House has approved a supplemental budget bill that would use higher-than-expected state revenue to pay for some state facilities’ needs.

A supplemental budget bill passed out of the State House on Thursday would spend $50 million on the Missouri State Capital, and put money toward renovation of the Department of Transportation Building (foreground).  (Photo courtesy; Missouri House Communications)

A supplemental budget bill passed out of the State House on Thursday would spend $50 million on the Missouri State Capital, and put money toward renovation of the Department of Transportation Building (foreground). (Photo courtesy; Missouri House Communications)

The state budget director says revenue collections are up 11.2 percent compared to this time last year and 27.4 percent over April 2012. Governor Jay Nixon has proposed putting $121 million of that extra income to use, and House leadership says it and the Senate are on board.

They propose using $13 million to design and plan a new Fulton State Mental Hospital to replace a facility the Mental Health Department says is outdated and unsafe.

The hospital is in the district of Representative Jeannie Riddle (R-Mokane). She says this would be a great step forward.

“It doesn’t look like a hospital. It doesn’t feel like a hospital. It was built so long ago that the practices that we like to participate now in the mental health issues are not anything like they had, so the facility doesn’t match how they need to handle the care. So for the clients that are there, for the staff that work there, I think it’s a light in the darkness right now.”

The plan would also spend $50 million on renovations at the State Capitol.

Representative Tom Flanigan (R-Carthage) is a member of the State Capitol Commission. He says that money will be used to increase the control of the environment inside the building.

“Windows to seal off the building and then a hi-vac system, so they can suck out all the humidity in the building because you’ve got to start somewhere before you can even get to the artwork … you’ve got to seal it off and you’ve got to be able to maintain the humidity in the building.”

$38 million is proposed to build a new state office building on the site of the historic Missouri State Penitentiary, 8 blocks from the Capitol along the Missouri River. The prison that opened in 1836 was decommissioned in September 2004 and Representative Jay Barnes (R-Jefferson City) says putting a new facility there would accomplish two goals.

“The priority for me for the site is first to kickstart economic development there, second, preserve the historic sites, and to do both of those things at the same time, which I think is entirely possible.”

The building would house state offices that are currently in leased space. House Budget Committee Chairman Rick Stream (R-Kirkwood) says that would make up the cost of the building in about 7 to 10 years, in money saved by ending those leases.

The plan would also spend at least $25.4 million on capital improvements, maintenance, repairs and renovations at state parks and historic sites.

The bill has been sent to the Senate.

House Medicaid reform sponsor settles for ‘mini Medicaid’ proposal

The sponsor of a Medicaid reform proposal in the House says it wouldn’t get past the Senate this year, but what he calls his “mini-Medicaid” bill has reached the Senate.

Representative Jay Barnes (photo courtesy; Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

Representative Jay Barnes (photo courtesy; Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

Representative Jay Barnes (R-Jefferson City) brought up his Medicaid “transformation” proposal (HB 700) for about 40 minutes of discussion on the House floor before withdrawing it. He had offered it as an amendment to a smaller bill (HB 986), the main provision of which would create a House-Senate committee to study reform in the interim.

“It’s now my hope that … we can work together with leaders on this issue from the Missouri Senate. I think that there’s an interest in there in exploring paths forward.”

Barnes expressed frustration with the chamber on the opposite end of the Capitol when he withdrew the larger bill.

“Unfortunately the Missouri State Senate has indicate it does not have the stomach to pick up a Medicaid transformation bill this year. Rather than figure out how we can make the best out of a bad situation, they are seeding the field for another year.”

The smaller of the bills, 986, has been sent to the Senate. It includes an “emergency clause” attached to the provision that would create the interim committee, that would make that portion law immediately upon being signed by the Governor.

While debating that clause, Representative Jeff Roorda (D-Barnhart) was sarcastic in voicing his frustration that neither Medicaid expansion nor reform are advancing this year.

“Well what’s the gall darn hurry? 461 people die next year, 300,000 will go without health insurance, we’ll leave $941-million dollars on the table … I don’t see what the ‘emergency’ is.” He added, “I’m going to support the emergency clause but I don’t want people to get the idea that [the House] is acting with any sense of urgency to address the biggest problem we have in our state right now.”

See our earlier stories on Medicaid this session

The proposed interim committee would be charged with creating a report by the end of this year that would cover: more efficient and cost-effective ways to provide coverage, how coverage can resemble commercially available coverage while meeting federal Medicaid requirements, possibilities for promoting healthy behavior and preventative care, the best way to provide incentives including a shared risk and savings to health plans and providers, and ways that a participant currently receiving coverage can transition to private sector coverage.

In addition to creating the interim committee, the legislation would extend the Ticket to Work program that helps people with disabilities get and keep jobs and increases Medicaid eligibility for foster children to age 26, the same age through which non-foster children are eligible to be covered by their parents’ insurance.

The bill would also change income eligibility determination standards to the individual’s modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) equivalent net income standard. Barnes says that will not increase eligibility, but would simplify the enrollment process.

House rejects attempt to let budget conferees adopt Medicaid expansion

House Democrats have made another attempt to get federal money for Medicaid built into the state budget.

Representative Jeff Roorda (photo courtesy; Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

Representative Jeff Roorda (photo courtesy; Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

Representative Jeff Roorda (D-Barnhart) offered a motion that would have allowed the House-Senate budget conference committee to consider adopting Medicaid expansion.

“To allow us to take about $900 million in federal funds, provide health insurance to 300,000 Missourians and put 25,000 Missourians back to work with our own tax money … the money we sent to Washington D.C. and Washington D.C. is trying to send that back here.”

Roorda says Medicaid expansion is the greatest job-creating proposal bill he’s ever seen as a legislator.

“If you cobble together every jobs bill, every economic development bill that has been filed … not passed, but filed … in the 7 years that I’ve served up here, they don’t even come close to creating the number of jobs that we create through Medicaid expansion. 25,000 jobs … we usually consider it swinging for the fences when we try to bring in an employer that creates 500 or even 1,000 jobs.”

Representative Jay Barnes (R-Jefferson City) says it’s more of the same debate.

“This body has been down this road before … and what the gentlemen’s amendment does is it attempts to build a Medicaid mansion on a crumbling foundation. I think there’s a better solution out there … hopefully we can work on it over the summer.”

Roorda’s motion was defeated along party lines, 53-102.

The House has voted to send Barnes’ proposal that would create a joint interim committee to study Medicaid reform to the Senate.