May 23, 2012

Harsh debate on House floor prior to rejection of Medicaid expansion

Emotional, heated, and harsh all describe debate on the House floor as the House rejects a proposed expansion of Medicaid contained in the social services budget bill.

Republicans in the House use their majority muscle to defeat HB 11, the social services budget bill that contained an expansion of Medicaid. The proposed expansion relied on an increase in the tax paid by Missouri hospitals. The $52.6 million raised through the increased hospital tax would be used to draw down $94.2 million in federal funds to provide coverage for Missourians making up to 50% of the federal poverty level, approximately 35,000 more Missourians.

Despite the fact that the proposal relied on an increase hospital tax, not an increase in General Revenue dollars, Republicans attacked it as an unnecessary expansion of Welfare.

Opposition by Republicans to HB 11 was well known prior to the bill coming to the floor for debate.

Rep. Mary Still, a Democrat from Columbia, noted the packed chamber prior to the vote.

"And it as if the majority party has come in for the kill," Still said of Republicans. "And it turns my stomach."

The House defeated the measure 75-85 on a mostly party-line vote.

Rep. Mike Talboy (D-Kansas City) spoke on the floor after exchanges had already gotten heated. He turned up the heat even more, refusing to call the proposal an expansion of Medicaid.

"In reality, it simply is a restoration of all the mistakes that were made in 2005," Talboy said, referring to cuts to Medicaid House Republicans pushed through that year to balance the state budget. "And the cruel and unchristian and unfair tax cuts…"

With the use of the term "unchristian" boos descended from Republicans, nearly drowning out Talboy and Speaker Pro Tem Bryan Pratt (R-Blue Springs) who he was debating.

Republican Tim Jones of Eureka even took note of the tenor of debate before speaking on the floor.

"Mr. Speaker, it sounded a little bit more like the House of Commons here today," Jones said, referring to the daily question period in Britain’s House of Commons which is often very lively, sometime raucous.

House Budget Chairman Allen Icet (R-Wildwood) brought the conference committee report of HB 11 to the floor for debate, even though he refused to sign the report. No House Republicans on the conference committee signed the report, a sign they didn’t agree to its contents.

Icet told colleagues he couldn’t accept the Medicaid expansion in the bill.

"I filed the bill, because I wanted to give the body the opportunity to debate the bill," Icet said to close debate on the bill. "But, Mr. Speaker, it is with a heavy heart that I encourage my colleagues to vote against HB 11"

After the House rejected the bill, Icet moved to return to a conference with Senate budget negotiators, which the House agreed to and the Senate accepted. Conference members worked out a compromise designed to move the budget process along so it can be completed by the Friday 6pm deadline. The House will consider than compromise Thursday morning. The deal puts the question of health care expansion off until next week, when the House and Senate will try to reach an agreement on SB 306 .

 

Download/listen Brent Martin reports (1:11 MP3)

Governor appoints task force to help foster children transition

Governor Blunt has formed a task force to review how the state can help foster children never placed in a home become independent.

Not all foster children get adopted. In fact, of the 9, 373 children in Missouri’s foster care system, about a quarter of them are at least 16 years old. Few of the older children will be adopted. They face the very real prospect of having to make the transition from the foster care system to independence.

Jessica Robinson, with the governor’s office, says Blunt has appointed 17 people to the task force. Members will represent both the public and private sector. It includes foster parents and foster children. He wants them to evaluate public and private resources available for foster children as they approach 18. A three-year plan for improvement should be forwarded to the governor by the end of the year. 

Download/listen Brent Martin reports (:60 MP3)

Lawmakers approve $22.5 billion spending plan

A $22-and-a-half billion spending blueprint for the coming fiscal year has been approved by the legislature and sent to Governor Blunt.

The debate grew noisy in the House, but was quiet in the Senate as the legislature put the final touches on the budget which begins July 1 st . Republicans in the House earlier had brushed aside harsh criticism from Democrats on the education bills. Spending plans for public schools and state colleges and universities were approved and sent to the Senate, which quickly picked up the bills and approved them.

On Wednesday, Democrats again lashed into Republicans, this time harshly criticizing spending bills that pay for health, mental health and social services. The mental health budget, contained in HB 2010 , totals $1.15 billion. Democrats say that’s not enough to provide the breadth of services needed for the mentally ill or to pay those who work in the state’s mental health facilities.

Democrats reserved their harshest criticism for HB 2011 , which contains spending for MO HealthNet, the new name for Medicaid. That budget bill totals nearly $7 billion, but Democrats argue the state has the money to restore the Medicaid cuts approved by Republicans in 2005.

Approval of both bills came on strictly party line votes.

Though the House debate featured sharp partisan barbs, the Senate gave quick approval to the budget bills without rancor, often without any debate at all.

The budget sent to Governor Blunt totals less than the document he proposed to the legislature. Concerns about the economic downturn, both nationally and in Missouri, led lawmakers to cut nearly $500 million from Blunt’s proposal.

The state operating budget is contained in HB 2001 to HB 2013

Download/listen Brent Martin reports (:60 MP3)

House completes work on record state budget

The House has completed work on a $22.4 billion spending plan for state programs and services. The package now moves to the Senate for its consideration.

State representatives began work on the budget upon their return from their combined spring and Easter break. The heavy lifting came Wednesday as the House engaged in floor debate in which it considered amendments to the 13 bills that make up the budget for the 2009 fiscal year that begins July first. Though the House debated the budget for nearly 12 hours, little changed from the spending blueprint which the House Budget Committee approved after holding public hearings since the beginning of the year.

Democrats, who have loudly criticized Republicans for cutting Medicaid in 2005, won a small victory by transferring two million dollars slated for hospital payments to restore physician approved therapies, such as physical therapy. Democrats say it’s still not enough. House Budget Committee Chairman Allen Icet (R-Wildwood) says the Medicaid budget which totals $6.7 billion is a $300 million increase. He also suggests that if legislators don’t rein in costs, the Medicaid budget would bankrupt the state.

The cuts enacted in 2005 during a very difficult budget year left 90,000 Missourians off Medicaid. Democrats contend that has grown to 170,000 and they say the cuts have kept the state from reaping more than a billion dollars in federal matching funds.

Though the budget for the coming year contains a $120 million increase in payments to public schools, Democrats say it’s not enough. Rep. Joe Aull (D-Marshall) said during floor debate that Republican leadership wouldn’t have to promote a bill to increase the minimum teacher salary if additional education funding would be provided. Republicans counter that the $5.2 billion budget for elementary and secondary schools is the largest in state history. Budget Committee Chairman Icet says the budget keeps the state’s commitment to children. He notes the education budget has more than doubled in the past ten years.

Partisan disagreement also centered on whether the state should pour more money into scholarships or into state college budgets. Republicans have greatly increased the funding of Access Missouri, which provides scholarships to college students. The House budget sets aside $100 million for the program. Democrats contend the shift of emphasis has sent universities scrambling for funding and has made access to college more difficult.

The House has approved a flat $1,056 pay raise for state employees. The governor had proposed a three percent increase.

Budget writers in the legislature have grown a bit more pessimistic about the state budget since the beginning of the year. Governor Blunt proposed a $23 billion budget. Concerns about a dampening economy have caused the legislature to trimmed that proposal by more than half a billion dollars. Still, the budget as it stands would be about one billion dollars larger than the current budget.

The budget bills are HB 2001-2013 and can be accessed at the Missouri General Assembly Web site .

 

 

Download/listen Brent Martin reports (:60 MP3)

House Speaker Says Insure Missouri Isn’t Dead, Yet

Governor Blunt has backed off implementing his Insure Missouri program without legislative approval. That doesn’t mean the program is dead, according to the Speaker of the House.

Blunt proposes the state help more Missourians buy their own health insurance, the concept behind a program called Insure Missouri. The Blunt Administration had argued that approval of MO HealthNet by the legislature last year gave it the go-ahead to create the program, a move that upset many legislators who claimed the administration was overstepping its authority.

House Speaker Rod Jetton, a Republican from Marble Hill, isn’t too critical of his fellow Republican, Governor Blunt, "I think he had a great concept. I think it’s a good direction for us to move as a state."

But Jetton quickly adds that he believes it’s a good idea for the administration work with both the Senate and the House, especially the budget committees, in implementing Insure Missouri. Jetton says Blunt’s decision to not push the program through without legislative approval has calmed down legislators angry the administration didn’t seek their input.

Jetton says there remains plenty of time this legislative session to push through an Insure Missouri bill, if needed. The session ends in mid-May. Jetton says sponsors of legislation need about six weeks to push bills through both chambers. Jetton says administration and legislative negotiators might be able to work out their difference and pave the way for Insure Missouri without formal legislation. 

Download/listen Brent Martin reports (:60 MP3)