May 23, 2013

Japanese beetle population to rise in the state (AUDIO)

Researchers at the University of Missouri say Japanese beetle populations throughout the state are likely to increase in the coming year.

Entomologist Wayne Bailey with the University of Missouri says the imported beetles, are some of the most aggressive bugs that feed on plants such as flowers, shrubs and trees; and corn and soybean crops. He says most of the damage by the beetles is during their peak months of June and July.

“We do have grubs underground at this time and what is happening is that population moves to the west,” he says. “It tends to build exponentially, so if you have 20 (beetles) in an area, then you might have 200 and then 2,000 and before you know it, 20,000.”

Bailey says the beetles were originally imported in 1916 and has made its way in to the state since 1934; but they’ve mainly stayed in the St. Louis area…until they began to move west about 15 years ago. “And so, in Columbia, we didn’t have a lemon tree in town I don’t think last year that wasn’t stripped by the adult beetle feeding,” he says. “We’re seeing this all the way now to Kansas- Wyandotte County in Kansas has its first report.”

He says the beetles’ adult lifespan only lasts six weeks, and says the beetles can be sprayed to be killed as adult beetles but they often feed in very large groups, which might make it difficult to get rid of them.

 Adult Japanese beetles are measured to be a half-inch long with a metallic green and bronze- or copper-colored wings.

AUDIO: Mary Farucci reports. (1:00)

FAPRI analyst: Food price impact of drought not seen yet, but coming

Corn and soybean market prices have hit record highs this week due to the Midwestern drought, but so far the impact on consumer prices is just beginning.

Drought damaged corn on the Goyings Farm in Paulding County, Ohio on Tuesday, July 17, 2012. USDA photo by Christina Reed.

Pat Westhoff is the Co-Director of the Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) at the University of Missouri. He says a consumer price report for June shows similar food price inflation to previous months. Price hikes are coming, but he says they’ll take time to reach supermarkets.

Changes in prices for products made directly from corn and soybean oil will come first. “The main effects are going to be probably a bit delayed because they’re going to happen through the livestock sector. As we all know, cattle production doesn’t turn on a dime, so it’s going to tack a while before we see reduced cattle numbers translate into less beef and less beef eventually turns into higher prices. Same holds for pork, same holds for chicken.”

Some manufacturers might start adjusting prices soon in anticipating of higher input costs. Westhoff says, “It’s important to remember a lot of those items are items where the farm value of the products that’s in those items is very small. If you buy a box of cereal, the actual amount of corn or wheat or something that’s included in that box of cereal is a very, very small share of the overall value of that product on the grocery store shelf. So, changing the farm price of corn or wheat by a lot only has a very small in proportion impact on prices at the grocery store.”

The good news, Westhoff says, is that the U.S. had been on track for lower food prices were it not for the drought. “So what this may do is instead of causing a huge, fast rate of growth in food prices in front of us, it may just stop what would have otherwise have been a decline in food price inflation in the months ahead.”

Westhoff says exactly how bad this year’s drought is won’t be fully known until it’s over, but among analysts it’s already being placed among historic company. “Clearly this has lots of parallels at least to 1988, the last time we had a really, really severe drought across the entire country … some people say it may be worse than 1988 already. Maybe more like some of the droughts of the 1950s.

“So there are some historic parallels but of course there are lots of things different in the world now than was the case back then.”

‘Right to Farm’ language stirs debate in Missouri House

The House has passed another omnibus bill with several agriculture provisions. The greatest amount of debate focused on what it means to have a “right to farm.”

A statute of Ceres, goddess of Agriculture tops the dome of the Missouri State Capital in Jefferson City. (Picture courtesy, Missouri House Communications)

The package includes a provision that would exempt farms from new state or local regulations that go into effect after they are in operation.

Some urban lawmakers, like Representative Tracy McCreery (I-St. Louis) say that gives an unfair advantage to established farmers. “It creates a tiered system where, depending on when your farm was incorporated, you would be able to follow different laws. I think a vote for this bill is a vote against the free market and against competition.”

Rural lawmakers say the protections are needed when new neighbors move in near a farm, and then try to force it to change how it operates through new local laws or lawsuits.

Representative John Cauthorn (R-Mexico) says his family has farmed the same land for 50 years. “(If) somebody moves in and starts complaining, if they’ve been there the same timeframe as I have, that’s fine. I don’t want to do anything not to be a good neighbor, but if we have someone move in that doesn’t like what I’m doing and is a new neighbor, I don’t think they have that right, or that freedom.”

Representative Jay Barnes (R-Jefferson City) says the law could actually protect local governments from putting themselves in legal jeopardy under the Constitution. “If the government takes your property, they’ve got to give you money for it. If a government changes regulations so much that they could put somebody out of business … that’s called a ‘regulatory taking.’ So what your bill is doing is probably actually protecting municipalities and counties from themselves if they’re going to overreach and try to put farms out of business that are already in business.”

The same language was included in another agriculture omnibus bill that the House passed last week.  Both packages are now in the Senate.