May 22, 2012

House advances two proposals related to Mamtek (AUDIO)

Two pieces of legislation have advanced in the House that stem from what has been learned about the failure of the Mamtek sugar refinery project in Moberly. Both were offered by the representative who chaired the committee that studied that deal, Jay Barnes (R-Jefferson City).

Representative Jay Barnes (photo courtesy, Missouri House Communications)

One is an amendment to HB 1455, which changes the Manufacturing Jobs Act. The other is a stand-alone bill, HB 1865. There are differences between the two, but some key provisions are found in both. They would require up-front verification of financial information by start-up companies applying for incentives, the sharing of “adverse” information received about a company and the creation by the Economic Development Department of a rating system for proposed projects. Barnes says he wanted to offer both so that the language has two opportunities to become law.

The proposals met with some opposition, especially from lawmakers who say they’ve heard from economic developers in their districts that the language goes too far. Barnes disagrees, “What my fear is, is that we haven’t gone far enough. There are a lot of other provisions our committee decided not to put forward because we wanted to put forth a proposal that should have overwhelming support from a body that generally supports protecting taxpayers. What we have is not as long as I’d like it to be.”

One of those who opposed the bill is Representative Denny Hoskins (R-Warrensburg). Of the provision that “adverse” information about a company should be shared, he said, “It seems like a big judgement call for these economic development corporations, also the Department of Economic Development, to determine what is ‘adverse’ and what is not ‘adverse.’ This might mean that all the companies would have to disclose all the information, and therefore be to the detriment of economic development in the state of Missouri.”

The representative whose district includes Moberly, Randy Asbury (R-Higbee), opposes the proposals. “As I read this legislation I’m unconvinced the outcome would have been any different had this new layer of beaurocracy been in place prior to Mamtek’s debut.”

Asbury disputes the requirement that start-up companies provide verification of financial information. “Just because we request financial verification for start-up companies does not mean anyone at any agency is qualified to make a better decision based on that information.” Mamtek provided a financial statement saying it had $7.2 million in cash or equivalent, but that was never verified by a third-party.

Both pieces of legislation can advance to the Senate on another positive vote. Both are likely to be voted on today.

AUDIO:  Representative Jay Barnes presents his amendment to HB 1455

Missouri chosen as site to produce next generation nuclear energy (AUDIO)

Westinghouse — a global leader in nuclear technology — has chosen Missouri as the location to develop and manufacture new generation small modular nuclear reactors.

Gov. Jay Nixon says it’s a once-in-a-generation opportunity that could spark a next-generation manufacturing industry in our state.

Kate Jackson, Westinghouse Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer, says the partnership coupled with Missouri’s workforce, strong foothold in the nuclear industry and central location create a competitive advantage.

Westinghouse will apply to the Department of Energy for project funding in May; Jackson is confident it will be approved.

No state legislative action or statutory change is needed to move forward … no taxpayer money would be used to fund the project.

Warner Baxter, president and CEO of Ameren Missouri, says the project will have a huge economic impact on our state.

The goal is to market the American-made reactors globally.

Westinghouse will apply for the competitive federal cost-share investment funds next month. If Westinghouse receives the investment funds — and Jackson says they will — they and Ameren Missouri would seek appropriate licenses from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to move forward with construction of a Westinghouse SMR at Ameren Missouri’s Callaway site.

Westinghouse says the project has unprecedented collaboration of all of Missouri’s electric power providers, including Ameren Missouri; the Missouri Association of Electric Cooperatives; the Missouri Public Utility Alliance; Associated Electric Cooperative Inc.; Empire District Electric; and Kansas City Power and Light.

Jackson adds that Westinghouse’s “experience, capabilities, and licensing expertise, coupled with Ameren’s working utility knowledge and Missouri’s highly skilled workforce, strong foothold in the nuclear industry, and central location create a competitive advantage to rapidly deploy SMR units here in the United States and elsewhere in the world.”

AUDIO: Jessica Machetta reports (1:19)

Second vote sends gold & silver bill to the Senate (AUDIO)

The House has approved a plan its sponsor says would give Missourians a more efficient way to back purchases with gold and silver, and hedge against inflation in the process. 

Representative Paul Curtman (picture courtesy, Missouri House of Representatives)

Representative Paul Curtman (R-Pacific) says his proposal is based on a new kind of business that has developed in Utah, that he describes as a sort of “clearing house” for gold and silver.

“The way they do it … it allows you to liquidate it and spend it in real-time. We’re not monetizing gold and silver in the sense that you’re going to walk into stores and use gold and silver, but if you have gold and silver and you put it in a depository, for lack of a better word, they might in exchange give you a debit card. So, you can go out and use your debit card and as you spend it the depository will sell off your gold and silver for you to cover the cost of the transaction.”

See Curtman’s proposal, HB 1637

Curtman says the plan only deals with U.S. minted gold and silver coins. He says Missourians can already back purchases with those precious metals, but his bill would simplify the process. “Right now you have to go through the process of going to a coin shop or going to a pawn shop, selling it all off and then going out and spending it. Doing it this way makes it much more convenient.”

He says it will help fight against inflation in the process.  “Beef, cotton, sugar … all this stuff has gone up twenty, thirty, forty, fifty percent over the last five years. None of the people in my district, to my knowledge at least, have been getting twenty, thirty, forty, fifty percent raises … Inflation always catches up with the consumer last, so we’re the ones that suffer the most from it. This bill will give people an opportunity … it’ll just protect the value of their labor and their money.”

The provisions of the bill won’t be utilized unless and until a business like the one in Utah is developed in Missouri. Curtman says, “Right now it’s a new concept and so there’s not really regulatory authority over it, so that’s one of the parts of the bill … if this happens, the Secretary of State’s Office would be the one to handle it, because it’s commodities exchange.”

House Democrats questioned the need for the legislation. Representative Mary Still (D-Columbia) says the legislature’s time would be better spent on more pressing issues. “To me, this is the height of nuttiness. This is the goofiest of the goofiest bills we have heard.”

Minority Floor Leader Mike Talboy (D-Kansas City) says the proposal would put Missouri back on the gold standard and stands no chance of passing in the Senate or being constitutional.

Curtman says he sees the challenge of getting support for the bill in the Senate as one of getting people to understand it. “It just helps facilitate the convenience of selling off your gold and silver almost (in) real-time in order to cover the cost of a commerce transaction, I think people will begin to understand.”

He says he was surprised at the resistance his proposal met. “I thought it was going to be an easy bill to get through.”

A rare second chance

The legislation was defeated in its initial third reading vote early Thursday afternoon after many lawmakers left the chamber to attend a media conference with Governor Jay Nixon regarding the development of new nuclear power reactors in Missouri.

When the body returned from a recess later in the afternoon, Representative Tim Meadows (D-Imperial) made a motion to reconsider the legislation, which could only have been made by a lawmaker that voted against it. He did so at the request of Majority Floor Leader Tim Jones, who said the bill would have passed if all the members of his caucus had been present.

The motion was carried, and the bill did pass on the second vote, 95-37.

Talboy said of Meadows’ decision, “Representative Meadows has been here longer than I have. He is a very thoughtful, thorough individual and he had discussions on what he thought was the right thing to do and I will stand behind my caucus member on that especially one with the integrity that Tim has.”

The proposal must still go through the Senate in the last four weeks of the session and be signed by the Governor to become law.

AUDIO:  Hear debate between Representatives Mary Still and Paul Curtman, 7:18

Prevailing wage change yet to prevail in Senate (AUDIO)

Opponents of Republican efforts to find a new way to pay workers on taxpayer-financed public works projects have driven the proposal to the side lines again.     

Senate Democratic leader Victor Callahan of Independence, who has helped keep the prevailing wage bill from coming to a vote in the senate, says the bill “is not reflective of any of the negotiations we have had with the interested parties<’ meaning contractors and others involved in public works projects. .

Sponsor Rob Mayer complains too many workers on outstate  taxpayer-financed projects are paid big-city union wages.  He says the state labor department system of setting workers wages for those projects should be thrown out in favor of a system that would pay lower salaries in many counties.  He says the lower salaries would be more appropriate in areas that have a lower standard of living. .  

Opponents’ stalling tactics have him ready to offer a compromise bill but he knows he’s running out of time  “We need to either pass it or we need to set it aside,”  he says.

That would not bother opponent Tim Green, who says there are more important public policy issues to be discussed in the waning days of this session-educational reform, energy policy, and controlling Medicaid costs among them.  -.

Mayer has not said if he’d use a rarely-used motion to stop debate by opponents and force a vote on his bill.  

Highlights of Senate debate:

AUDIO: debate excerpt 34:09

AUDIO: Another debate excerpt 38:52

AUDIO: interview with Mayer 11:00

Some unemployment benefits to end

The Department of Labor and Industrial Relations reports that due to a steadily declining unemployment rate, Missouri no longer meets the criteria to operate the state Extended Benefit unemployment program, which affects 9,000 of the 112,000 Missourians currently receiving unemployment.

“Missouri’s unemployment rate of 7.4 percent is the lowest it has been in 38 months and is down from a peak of 9.7 percent in August 2009,” the release says. “Based on data released by the United States Department of Labor, Missouri no longer meets one of the criteria to remain in the EB program. Specifically, its current three-month average total unemployment rate is less than 110 percent of any comparable unemployment rate during the past three years.”

Extended Benefits is the last level of unemployment benefits for those who have exhausted regular state benefits and all tiers of Emergency Unemployment Compensation program. Under federal law, EB claimants will not be able to receive further payments under the EB program after April 7, 2012, regardless of their claim balance. Those affected by this law are encouraged to continue utilizing the Missouri Career Centers for job assistance, the report continues.

For more, visit www.moclaim.mo.gov.