May 22, 2013

Right to farm amendment goes to the people (AUDIO)

Missourians will have a chance to decide if farmers should have a constitutional right to do what they’re doing.    The legislature has sent them the so-called “Right to Farm” amendment.   

Representative Bill Reiboldt (photo courtesy; Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

Representative Bill Reiboldt has carried a right to farm proposal for three years in the House. (photo courtesy; Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

The movement to create the amendment was triggered by the “Puppy Mill” petition campaign putting limits on pet breeders.  Voters approved the puppy breeding law but the legislature immediately changed it, saying it needed to be more practical.   Regulation of pet breeders is handled by the state agriculture department.                                             

The original proposals would have prohibited petition efforts such as Proposition B creating agricultural laws, but that idea has been removed.  St. Louis Senator Scott Sifton thinks that’s the most important change made in the three years of work on the bill.

“What’s most important to me is…that the power of the people to check the legislature on that subject matter and any other agriculture subject matter is not something I do not  want to see taken away from them,” he says.

The proposal also retains the right of local governments to pass ordinances on zoning, health, and environmental issues., The original proposal would have eliminated that local government authority.

Early versions of the proposal also dealt with the abilities of local governments to pass ordinances and laws restricting farming. The legislature finally agreed on a compromise that says the amendment would not interfere with rights afforded local governments elsewhere in the Constitution.

Desloge Representative Linda Black says what is going to voters deals more directly with the right to farm.

“We had kind of gotten bogged down in the House on petition issues, trying to put protective language in that resolution … I think that the compromise that was struck leaves out any language for petitions but it does kind of soften the ability for local municipalities and counties to implement ordinances that enforce any kind of laws that have to do with livestock or agriculture.”

Black says the proposal will also extend protection to urban farming.

The Missouri Farm Bureau is one of the groups that has pushed for a right to farm amendment. President Blake Hurst says his group was comfortable with the language dealing with local control issues being removed, but they still want the state’s initiative petition process to be addressed.

AUDIO: Senate Debate 31:04

Right to Farm bill righted; debate next week (AUDIO)

The proposed Freedom to Farm amendment has gotten a new life as the legislative session heads into its last week.  The bill had stalled in the Senate this week when critics worried it would keep county governments from enacting health, environmental, and safety ordinances.

But senator Jolie Justus, who represents several mid-Missouri agricultural counties, tells colleague Rob Schaaf of St. Joseph  a phrase will be added that  takes care of her concerns. It refers to the constitutional authority local governments have to adopt ordinances.

                        AUDIO: Justus/Schaaf :22

The bill has been sent back to a conference committee to add the local-control language

 

 

Right to Farm is wrong approach, say critics (AUDIO)

A proposed constitutional amendment guaranteeing Missourians have a right to farm has hit some rocky ground in the Senate where critics say it poses dangers within promises of security.

House and Senate negotiators want to put an issue to the voters saying,  “the right of farmers and ranchers to engage in farming and ranching practices shall be forever guaranteed in this state.”   Sounds simple, but Senate Sponsor Mike Parson of Bolivar tells colleagues it’s a question mark.  “I think you could throw all the answers in a hat and nobody knows,” he says.

But some senators know they don’t like the removal of language giving local governments power to regulate agricultural operations on health and environmental issues.  Senator Jolie Justus, who represents rural counties in mid-Missouri  has led opposition to the amendment without that wording, saying, “I had hoped that we were there and it looks like we’re not.”

Several counties have passed ordinances limiting big pig farms, for example.  She says the proposed amendment could keep counties from protecting local citizens from problems associated with those operations. 

Parson could not get a final vote on his bill but promises to keep working .  If the legislature approves the bill, the issue goes to a statewide vote.

Audio: Debate, part 1 :38:25

Audio: Debate part 2 42:12

 

 

 

 

Cattle theft becomes a growing problem in southwest Missouri (AUDIO)

Law enforcement officials say cattle theft is on the rise. A livestock specialist with the University of Missouri says Southwest Missouri continues to be a growing problem.

Livestock specialist Eldon Cole with the University of Missouri Extension says that cattle theft in areas between Joplin and Springfield is a big problem — and only getting worse.

He says most thieves snatch the animals in the middle of the night with a motive for money and profit. Cole says most cattle thieves are after feeding cattle that weigh between 500 to 750 pounds and are valued at a minimum of $800.

“Cattle being at a pretty decent price right now, with a little bit of effort, they seem to be able to pick up between 12 to 15 heads (of cattle) whenever they strike,” Cole said.

Cole says within the last year, cattle theft has seemed to ramp up, even in other states.

“Primarily to the west of Missouri, and here it seems to be a little bit more of a hot spot than in some of these others,” he said. “Some of the other states have lost significant numbers more so than we have from any one group.”

He adds that cattle industry experts in Southwest Missouri say there has been nearly 1,000 cattle stolen from their owners in the past 12 to 15 months.

AUDIO: Mary Farucci reports. (1:10)

Lawmakers: ‘Right to farm’ proposal not likely to pass

House and Senate lawmakers have met to debate what language should go in Missouri’s Constitution to guarantee a right to farm, but some say the issue is not likely to pass this session.

The Senate version of the proposal includes language to protect the power of political subdivisions to regulate farming, such as through a county health ordinance. The conference committee voted to omit that.

Rep. Jason Smith (R-Salem) says that language would create two constitutional rights.

“The right to farm and also the right of political subdivisions to conflict with the Constitution,” he says, “and I think that’s a big problem.”

Rep. Linda Black (D-Desloge) says leaving that language in would create a greater threat to farming.

“Then they could do a more narrowly defined effort on a local level, because if you have a drive in each county to put something on a local ballot you could actually kill the right to farm on an individual county-by-county basis … and we see that there may be an effort out there to do that.”

Sen. Jolie Justus (D-Kansas City) says without that language in there, several members of her caucus have said they will vote to kill the bill. She and Black agree the issue is likely dead for the session.

Justus says the real way to prevent future challenges to farming is to change the initiative petition process, something she hopes can be accomplished next year.

“We need to strike a balance between citizens being able to petition their government and also realizing that right now the system is set up so that wealthy individuals and organizations can put things on the ballot very easily in this state,” Justus says. “It’s an end run around the legislature and I don’t think it’s what direct democracy should be about.”

The proposals are HJRs 11 and 7.